Dijo Thomas
solves one of the Two Biggest Mysteries [ along with Yethi -
the Himalayan snow man / Big Foot] in the World - Is
Chupacabra
Fake or Real ?
Scientist
& Wildlife Conservationist Dijo Thomas has already Proved
Scientifically
that Raktha Athika {Vampire
Kangaroo} is
a New Species & a New Family.
Proofs
that Chupacabra Exists::
1.
Food: Raktha Adhika Drinks the blood
of Goats & Chicken.
Food:
Chupacabra
Drinks the blood of Goats & Chicken.
2.
Raktha Adhika: Two holes on the neck of the
prey.
Same
Features are found in the Victims of Chupacabra.
3.
Raktha Adhika Do not eat Flesh.
Chupacabra
Do not eat Flesh.
4.
Photo of Chupacabra
is very similar to that of Raktha Adhika. { Now the
video which I saw in 2016 in Youtube, has been delated. But
someone will have a copy. Pls upload that & send it to me}
5.
Nature of Hair is same for Both Raktha Athika
& Chupacabra
!
There
is are many More Similarities between Raktha Athika
& Chupacabra.
As
Raktha Athika has been Scientifically Proven by Dijo Thomas
in 2016 !
Chupacabra
has also been Proven by Dijo Thomas in early 2017 !
YouTube
�� �� Does Chupacabra Really Exist ❓ Scientist and Conservation
Biologist Scientifically
Proves that Chupacabra Really Exists ❗
https://youtu.be/S_mK9gWkpc4
..........................................................................................
2. �� �� English | ViewReal Chupacabra/ Raktha Athika Video-
Discovered&
ScientificallyProvedBy Dijo Thomas. ACV Special Report .
https://youtu.be/G-M28lAlhRI
�� �� Chupacabra Really Exists in America❗
✅ Scientifically Proven !
❓ But How did the American Scientists go Wrong on Chupacabra
?
..........................................................................................
■ This is a Real Picture of Chupacabra in Kerala, India ; which
has been Named Raktha Athika
{ Blood Sucker } !
■ Chupacabra will More or Less Look Like Raktha Athika in this
Picture ❗
�� �� Raktha Athika [ Vampire Kangaroo ]
(Pron: Rek-tha Ya-thi-ka) is a Newly Discovered Species ;
a Blood Drinking Mammal that was obtained in a Cage in Pavaratty,
Thrissur, Kerala, India in June
2016 ❗
�� Raktha Athika Family is Closely Related to Macropodidae Family,
ie. Kangaroo Family.
�� Chupacabra is the Second Species in Raktha Athika Family
❗
..........................................................................................
............................................................................................
❌ How the American Scientists, went TERRIBLY WRONG on Chupacabra
❗
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
⛔ 1. NATURE of the HAIR on CHUPACABRA is one of the Main POINTS
that the Scientists in
America Went TERRIBLY WRONG on Chupacabra ❗❗
⛔ Plainly, They Were NOT ABLE to Differentiate and Properly
Find Out The NATURE of the HAIR
on CHUPACABRA and It's Difference with Other Mammals❗
�� But this is NOT the Only Point, where, the American Scientists,
went Wrong !
�� Infact, on MOST of the MAIN POINTS , the American Scientists,
went TERRIBLY WRONG on
Chupacabra ❗
�� 2. Just Because the American Scientists Got Only the Body
of a Coyote with Mange ; they "
ASSUMED " that " All the Sightings of Numerous People
were Only Coyotes ❗��
❌ I would Say that, it was a Very Foolish Way of Proving the
Non-existance of Chupacabra !
�� But No-Body Till this Moment, Thought of This Important Point
;
and as a Result, No-Body Till this Moment said about this Fact
❗
�� As a Result , it Got Widely Accepted that Chupacabra Doesn't
Exist !
�� 3. Though there is Bound to be Many False Eyewitnesses, the
American Scientists , Again "
ASSUMED That " All Eyewitnesses are Wrong ! Which, Now
is Evident, were Not !
�� 4. �� Eyewitnesses are Very Important in Any Discovery ;
Differentiating Between the Real
and Wrong Eyewitnesses is Very Important !
�� American Scientists Failed in this also.
�� 5. In August 2016 , I saw a Video of a Real Chupacabra, sitting
in a Cage in American
Continent in YouTube. ( But I Don't see that Video in YouTube
Now. )
�� American Scientists Failed again to Properly Understand the
UNIQUENESS of the
Morphological Features of the Chupacabra Obtained in a Cage
!
............................................................................................
❌ Thus an Important and Rare Wild Animal , CHUPACABRA , which
; was Wrongly Assumed to
be NON-EXISTANT by the American Scientists ❗
⛔ This Mistake by American Scientists have a Big Negative Impact
for the Conservation of one
of the Most Important Species in the World, the CHUPACABRA ❗
............................................................................................
�� Finally that Task Of Scientifically Proving Chupacabra ,
also fell on the Shoulders of Dijo
Thomas , from 15,000 /- Kms away ❗
............................................................................................
............................................................................................
▪�� The NATURE of the HAIR on CHUPACABRA and Raktha Athika
■ The NATURE of the HAIR on CHUPACABRA and Raktha Athika is
⛔ ITS NATURAL
CONDITION ❗❗❗
■ The NATURE of the HAIR on CHUPACABRA and Raktha Athika is
, Again , Similar to that of
HUMANS , Than that of Other Mammals like Felines, Cannids, Hyaenidaes,
Viverrids or Even
Other Primates !!!
�� If You Observe Very Closely, You Can See that ➖ the NATURE
of the HAIR on Raktha Athika
is Very Long, ---- Infact Extremely Long for Any Mammals ----
, but very Thin ( You can barely see it
in the photo, unless You closely observe ), Semi - Curly and
Not at all Strong ❗
�� The NATURE of the HAIR on Raktha Athika is in Sharp Contrast
to Other Mammals like
Felines, Cannids, Hyaenidaes, Viverrids - which are Mostly Short
and Strong ;
And Very Different from Other Primates !!
�� The Above Evidences, Stated by Dijo Thomas, Clearly Proves
that The NATURE of the HAIR
on CHUPACABRA and Raktha Athika is NOT BECAUSE of Mange !
............................................................................................
............................................................................................
�� Read More :
1. 1. Read More on Raktha Athika ( Vampire Kangaroo ) :
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=557050902140594&id=100035070674792
( Detailed )
2. Dijo Thomas solves one of the Two Biggest Mysteries [ along
with Yethi - the Himalayan
snow man / Big Foot] in the World - Is Chupacabra Fake or Real
?
( In Nutshell )
http://wildlifescientist.com/DijoThomas-Proves-Chupacabra.htm
3. Documentary | English ( Detailed )
�� �� Is Chupacabra in America Real or Fake? Scientist Dijo
Thomas Proves Chupacabra Exists!
Documentary
https://youtu.be/S_mK9gWkpc4
..........................................................................................
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2011-03-31-ct-met-kass-0331-20110331-story
.html
Chicago Tribune
Don't let science suck the life
out of Chupacabra story
John Kass
March 31, 2011
Once again, the cynics are going out of their way to debunk
the existence of the Chupacabra, the
hairless, bloodsucking vampire, or goat sucker, as it is affectionately
called.
As millions of Americans know, it often sidles up to its victims,
then rises on its naked haunches,
before it feeds.
But now comes Benjamin Radford, managing editor of something
called Skeptical Inquirer
science magazine. His aim? To debunk the noble creature.
"I would say it's no more or no less as real as Santa Claus,"
Radford recently told KRQE, an
Albuquerque, N.M., TV station.
Really, Mr. Radford? How sad. How nauseating. How utterly predictable.
And how positively dangerous for American taxpayers, if Mr.
Radford and his cynics are able to
convince us there's no such thing as a bloodsucker.
Let me tell you something, mister. As a newspaperman who often
deals with politicians, I can tell
you for a fact that Chupacabras do exist. I've seen them hard
at work, drawing nourishment from
millions upon millions of defenseless beings, gorging while
making happy noises deep in their
throats.
And if you ever caught them feeding and dared try to stop them,
they'd probably pull a Sen.
Chuck Schumer on you and call a news conference to shriek that
those who would deny them
nourishment are being "unreasonable" and "too
extreme"!
Yes, the Chupacabras are often vicious. And yes, it is also
true that for years I've wished to own
one as a pet, to keep on a silver chain for my amusement.
But Radford isn't interested in what I want. He's the author
of a new book, "Tracking the
Chupacabra," as if I'll ever purchase a volume.
Radford, whom I have absolutely no intention of ever interviewing
in my lifetime, wasted five
precious years of his life hoping to trace the roots of the
beast.
The reason?
He wanted to find the source of it, in the hopes of killing
it in our collective mind, and thus
rendering it extinct.
"It doesn't matter what I write," whined Radford to
ABC recently. "It doesn't matter that I solve
this. People are still going to see a weird hairless thing,
and someone is going to call it a
Chupacabra."
Or perhaps they'll call it a Schumer.
Radford says people like mysteries and have been fascinated
by the idea of a beast that sucks
goats' blood. "It captures the public's imagination,"
he said.
His quest begins with Ms. Chupacabra herself, Madelyne Tolentino,
of Puerto Rico.
In 1995, Tolentino stunned the world by saying she'd spotted
the vampire near her home. She
described the creature as a biped, about 3 to 5 feet tall, with
red or black eyes, skinny arms and
spikes down the back. The Chupacabra had no ears and had small
air holes instead of a nose.
The story aired in 1995 on "Cristina" — the Oprah
Winfrey of Spanish-language television.
And soon, Chupacabra sightings popped up in Puerto Rico. Later
the beasts were spotted
elsewhere in Latin America, and the southwestern United States.
Two were thought to have been
shot dead in Texas in 2010, but these turned out to be dogs
who lost their hair to strange mites.
Weirdly enough, no Chupacabra has ever been officially spotted
in Washington, D.C., perhaps
because they blend in so easily with all the other bloodsucking
creatures.
Naturally, Radford also blames the media for promoting the Chupacabra
phenomenon.
So, as his story goes, he interviewed Tolentino and got her
to reveal a damning "fact":
That shortly before she confessed to seeing the Chupacabra in
1995, she'd seen the sci-fi
movie "Species." The descriptions, he said, of the
creature in "Species" and her "post-Species"
Chupacabra were more than coincidental.
"To me," Radford was quoted as saying, "that
was the smoking gun. It can't be coincidence, but
this Chupacabra that's now popping up around the world just
happened to look exactly like the
monster in the sci-fi film."
Perhaps.
According to the equally credible Wikipedia, the film starring
fine actors like Ben
Kingsley and Forest Whitaker, "is about a group of scientists
who try to track down and trap a
killer alien seductress before she successfully mates with a
human male."
The statuesque and somewhat blond Natasha Henstridge is the
alien, who wears sexy clothes
including (as I vaguely remember it) a skin-tight black cat
suit. And she's also quite deadly in
bed.
But in the interest of accuracy, I consulted the IMDb website,
which offered the following review,
which "30 of 37 people found helpful."
"For some reason, a quality cast … signed up for this knockabout
trash about an escaped
alien-human hybrid in a search of a mate … and is little more
than an excuse for a few car chases
and many sightings of Natasha Henstridge's (bosoms)."
This may be, but focusing on Henstridge's anatomy and her female-preying-mantis-mating
ritual
is a complete distraction. It's also a red herring.
But it's just the kind of thing that a devious creature like
the Chupacabra, and its most eager
manservant, Mr. Benjamin Radford, would want us to believe.
The thing is, there is absolutely no scientific proof that just
because Ms. Chupacabra watched
"Species," that she also didn't see a freaky Chupacabra
outside her home a couple of weeks later.
Chupacabras are indeed tricky beasts. And their greatest trick
is convincing people that they're
not real.
But they always leave their tracks. Just look at your tax bill,
and tell me they don't exist.
jskass@tribune.com
..........................................................................................
Media Reports
Report
in Deccan Chronicle Daily, a prominent Indian
News Paper & the most trusted English Newspaper in India,
on 16 Nov 2019 regarding the Discovery
& Scientific Proving of Raktha
Athika, the Vampire Kangaroo, in Thrissur dist of Kerala
TV
Reports
1.
Raktha_Adhika-Prime News - 21Aug2016 - YouTube
2.
RakthaAdhika-TCV_News-29 08 16 - YouTube
........................................................................................
News
Paper Reports
Media - Back Cover Page Report in Mangalam
Daily, a prominent Kerala News Paper, on Raktha Adhika
on 24 Aug 16.
Media
- Mangalam Back Cover Report on Raktha
Adhika on 24 Aug 16.
........................................................................................
Media
- Report in Back Cover Page of Kerala
Kaumudi Daily, a prominent Kerala News Paper, on Raktha
Adhika on 09 Sep 16.
RakthaAdhika9Sep16KeralaKaumudi
Front PageReport in Dina Malar, the
Second Largest Circulated News Paper in Tamil Nadu on 13 Nov
19 .
Dijo
Thomas presenting the Scientific Paper on
Raktha Adhika,
the NEW Species Found by him in 104th
Indian Science Congress; held at SV University,
Tirupathi on 06 Jan 2017
........................................................................................
|
Donate-4-Conservation
